A lot of people have been confused between Garmin Fenix 3 vs Suunto Ambit3. Both of these two products are stylish smartwatches that can help you track your fitness levels and performance as you run and exercise. You can say that they are available in a similar price range, although Garmin Fenix 3 is usually a little more expensive than Suunto Ambit3. In this article, we will focus on the HR version of Garmin Fenix 3 to make it comparable to Suunto Ambit3, which has heart rate tracking.
Design and Comfort
In terms of design and appearance, Garmin Fenix 3 indeed holds the better edge. It has a high-res color display, which looks very nice. The metallic bezel looks solid and durable. It features several solid buttons on the sides. The wrist bands are flexible, soft, and comfortable.
On the other hand, Suunto Ambit3 appears simple and minimalistic. It has a monochrome display. The bezel is thick and seems to be made of the same material as the housing. It has somewhat bulky buttons on the sides. Take a look at our previous discussion on Suunto Traverse vs Ambit3.
However, surprisingly, Suunto Ambit3 is more comfortable to wear. Garmin Fenix 3 has many ‘sharp’ edges that constantly remind you about the smartwatch, making it feel as if it is thick and bulky. On the other hand, Suunto Ambit3 simply disappears into your skin, and the wrist bands fit very well.
There is no competition in this sector – Garmin Fenix 3 is straightforwardly the winner. The color display is much better. The sharpness is very nice and pleasant to look at. It is also easily readable under the sun. On the other hand, Suunto Ambit3’s monochrome display is not particularly eye-catching, and the display is not easily readable under the sun. Having to shield the screen to read the information is indeed an unnecessary annoyance.
Garmin Fenix 3 excels in terms of features because it comes with nice additional features, such as vibration alerts, cadence tracking, and external sensor support. It has an integrated wrist-based heart rate sensor, though, so you will not need to wear a chest strap. The accelerometer and cadence tracking tend to be more accurate.
On the other hand, Suunto Ambit3 may boast its superior GPS tracking accuracy. Compared to Garmin Fenix 3, Suunto Ambit3’s GPS tracking is constantly more accurate. However, the accelerometer and cadence tracking are not as accurate. Just like many other Suunto models, Suunto Ambit3 is designed to integrate with your smartphone. You can upload your GPS-tracked activities to the Movescount App to create a 3D flyover animation of the route.
Finally, the comparison between Garmin Fenix 3 vs Suunto Ambit3 comes down to the battery life. In terms of battery life, Suunto Ambit3 is the winner. In the best GPS mode, it can last for about 20 hours. But with a 60-second update interval, the battery life is improved to 200 hours.
Garmin Fenix 3 can last for about 20 hours in the highest GPS setting. It has the UltraTrac mode which adjusts the update interval to allow the smartwatch to last for about 50 hours.
|Name||Garmin Fenix 3||Suunto Ambit3|
|Key Features||- BLACK SILICONE BAND - Soft, flexible black silicone band adds luxurious feel with resistance to discoloration
- CHROMA DISPLAY - 1.2” sunlight-visible high-resolution color Chroma optically-bonded display||- Includes built in altimeter, barometer, compass and GPS with 100 meter water resistance
- One of the most competitive battery hours in the market, 200 hours with 1 minute accuracy|
|Best Offer*||Save Money Please click here||Save Money Please click here|
Overall, Garmin Fenix 3 is the winner. It has a more stylish look, a much better display that is easily readable under the sun, and more features. The cadence and accelerometer are more accurate. However, Suunto Ambit3 can be the alternative if you prioritize the GPS accuracy and battery life.